Legal Opinion
In Re Jennings
United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Oregon
Decided January 8, 2004No. 19-60213PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
FRANK R. ALLEY, III, Bankruptcy Judge.
Debtor objects to the assertion of her former husband that his claim, based on the judgment dissolving their marriage, is entitled to priority. The matter was heard on December 11, 2003, at which time both parties presented testimony and other evidence. After reviewing the record, I conclude that the claim is not entitled to priority, and that the objection should be sustained.
I. BACKGROUND
The marriage of Debtor Karen Jennings and Claimant Patrick B. Murray was dissolved by a judgment of the Circuit Court for Lane County, Oregon filed on…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- In Re Robert Gruntz, Debtor. Robert Gruntz v. Opinion County of Los Angeles Los Angeles District AttorneyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- In Re Edward Elijah Williams, Debtor. Joyce Colleen Williams v. Edward Elijah WilliamsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1983
- In Re Herbert L. HOLM, Debtor. Alan WRIGHT, Creditor-Appellee, v. Herbert L. HOLM, Debtor-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
- Bankr. L. Rep. P 69,922 Nancy H. Shaver v. Peter Frank ShaverCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
- Hayhoe v. Cole (In Re Cole)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Wank v. Gordon (In Re Wank)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
- In Re KingUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Alaska · 2010
- In re HelligrathUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Ohio · 2017
- Wank v. Gordon (In Re Wank)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 2014