Legal Opinion
Day v. Azar
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided April 2, 2018No. Case No. 1:16–cv–02513 (TNM)PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
TREVOR N. McFADDEN, United States District Judge
On September 30, 2016, Phyllis Day filed a Complaint in the Superior Court of the District of Columbia, alleging that her employer, the Department of Health and Human Services, retaliated against her in 2011 and 2012 for engaging in activity protected by Title VII.1 The Secretary of the Department removed the case to this court under 28 U.S.C. § 1442(a)(1) and moved to dismiss the case for lack of jurisdiction, failure to exhaust administrative remedies, and failure to state a claim. Ms. Day, who hired counsel after filing her Complaint,…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- United States v. SherwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Lane v. PenaSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Victor Herbert v. National Academy of SciencesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1992
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Williams v. PerdueCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2019
- Berry v. ButtigiegDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2025
- Biron v. GeorgeDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2023
- Cobb v. BakerDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2022
- Cobb v. BakerDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2022
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.