Legal Opinion
Dickens v. Autozone, Inc.
District Court, S.D. Mississippi
Decided February 11, 2021No. 1:18-cv-00162Unknown
1Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI SOUTHERN DIVISION WILLIAM DICKENS and PLAINTIFFS KARLA DICKENS v. CAUSE NO. 1:18CV162-LG-JCG A-1 AUTO PARTS & REPAIR INC., et al. DEFENDANTS MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT FORD MOTOR CO.’S MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT BEFORE THE COURT are two [401] [405] Motions for Summary Judgment filed by Defendant Ford Motor Co. (“Ford”). The issues have been fully briefed by the parties. After due consideration of the Motion and the relevant law, it is the Court’s opinion that the Motions should be granted.…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Little v. Liquid Air Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1994
- RSR Corp. v. International InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2010
- Cutting Underwater Technologies USA, Inc. v. Eni U.S. Operating Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2012
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.