Legal Opinion

State v. Fowler

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided April 7, 2011No. CC 07-08-8861C1; CA A140410; SC S058769PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKistler, J.

Defendant has petitioned for review of a Court of Appeals decision that affirmed without opinion two judgments entered by the trial court — a general judgment and a supplemental judgment. For the reasons that follow, we allow the petition for review in part, 1 vacate the Court of Appeals decision in part, and remand the case to the Court of Appeals with instructions to dismiss defendant’s appeal of the supplemental judgment for lack of jurisdiction.

The facts pertinent to our disposition of this case are procedural. On September 18, 2008, a jury convicted defendant by a 10-to-2 vote of…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State v. Ferman-VelascoOregon Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Stahl v. KrasowskiOregon Supreme Court · 1978
  3. State v. AinsworthOregon Supreme Court · 2009
  4. Snider v. Production Chemical Manufacturing, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 2010
  5. State v. HardingOregon Supreme Court · 2009

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State v. MullinsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2011
  2. State v. MullinsOregon Supreme Court · 2012
  3. State v. WhiteCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2011
  4. State v. FowlerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2011
  5. State v. WhiteCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2013

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API