Legal Opinion

Southern Concrete Co. v. METROTEC FINANCIAL, INC.

Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)

Decided August 4, 1989No. 05-87-00592-CVPublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STEWART, Justice.

Southern Concrete Company appeals from the judgment of the trial court that failed to award Southern its attorneys’ fees incurred in the successful prosecution of its case against Metrotec Financial, Inc., and Jake Murrell. In nine points of error, Southern contends that it should have been awarded its reasonable attorneys’ fees because; (1) the evidence conclusively established that Southern made a proper presentment of its claims to Metrotec as a matter of law; (2) the trial court’s finding that Southern failed to make a proper presentment of its claim to Metrotec was…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Cain v. BainTexas Supreme Court · 1986
  2. Holley v. WattsTexas Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Hruska v. First State Bank of DeanvilleTexas Supreme Court · 1988
  4. Aero Energy, Inc. v. Circle C Drilling Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1985
  5. Flint & Associates v. Intercontinental Pipe & Steel, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1987

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Tony Gullo Motors I, L.P. and Brien Garcia v. Nury ChapaTexas Supreme Court · 2006
  2. West Beach Marina, Ltd. v. Erdeljac, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2002
  3. O'Farrill Avila v. Gonzalez, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1998
  4. Marrs & Smith Partnership v. D.K. Boyd Oil & Gas Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)2005
  5. Willis v. Donnelly, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2003

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API