Legal Opinion

KIRCHBERG v. FEENSTRA Et Al.

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided March 23, 1981No. 79-1388PublishedCited by 169 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Marshall

In this appeal we consider the constitutionality of a now superseded Louisiana statute that gave a husband, as “head and master” of property jointly owned with his wife, the unilateral right to dispose of such property without his spouse’s consent. Concluding that the provision violates the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment, we affirm the judgment of the Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit invalidating the statute.

I

In 1974, appellee Joan Feenstra filed a criminal complaint against her husband, Harold Feenstra, charging him with molesting their minor daughter. While…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Taylor v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. Craig v. BorenSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Personnel Administrator of Mass. v. FeeneySupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  4. Reed v. ReedSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  5. Frontiero v. RichardsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1973

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by169 opinions

  1. J. E. B. v. Alabama ex rel. T. B.Supreme Court of the United States · 1994
  2. JEB v. Alabama Ex Rel. TBSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  3. United States v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  4. Mississippi University for Women v. HoganSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  5. Obergefell v. HodgesSupreme Court of the United States · 2015

164 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API