Legal Opinion

Giles v. Mineral Resources International, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Utah

Decided October 30, 2014No. 20130694-CAPublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

PEARCE, Judge:

- T1 This appeal concerns a breach of fidu-clary duty claim that was the subject of a successful summary judgment motion. Mineral Resources International, Inc. (MRI) challenges the district court's grant of summary judgment in favor of James Giles and award of attorney fees to Giles. The district court ruled that MRI had not presented sufficient evidence of actual damages caused by the alleged breach of the duty Giles owed MRI. On appeal, MRI contends that it presented sufficient evidence of damages to survive summary judgment. MRI further contends that even if the…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. CampbellSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
  2. Turtle Management, Inc. v. Haggis Management, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Weaver v. Blue Cross-Blue ShieldWyoming Supreme Court · 1980
  4. Campbell v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.Utah Supreme Court · 2001
  5. Foote v. ClarkUtah Supreme Court · 1998

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Federated Capital Corp. v. HanerCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2015
  2. Thomas v. MattenaCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2017
  3. In Re ChristensenUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Utah · 2019
  4. Crossgrove v. Stan Checketts Properties, LLCCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2015
  5. Brodkin v. Tuhaye Golf, LLCCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2015

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API