Legal Opinion

Victore Insurance Co. v. City of Bowie

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided June 1, 2000No. 2-99-070-CVPublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION ON REHEARING

CAYCE, Chief Justice.

I.Introduction

We grant Victore Insurance Company’s motion for rehearing, withdraw our opinion and judgment of March 9, 2000, and substitute this opinion and judgment.

The primary issue we must decide in this appeal is whether Diamondback Construction, Inc., a public work contractor, acquired a property interest in the final payment due under its public work contract with the City of Bowie, Texas even though Diamondback failed to pay all costs necessary to complete the contract. Because we hold Diamondback did not acquire a property interest in the…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. McGalliard v. KuhlmannTexas Supreme Court · 1986
  2. United States v. RodgersSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. United States v. National Bank of CommerceSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. Frank L. Broday v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1972
  5. Forbis v. Trinity Universal Insurance Co. of KansasCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1992

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Capitol Indemnity Corporation v. United States of America, United States of America and Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2006
  2. Harris County Flood Control District v. Great American Insurance Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2011
  3. Kemper Insurance Companies v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
  4. Gallegos v. EspinozaNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2001
  5. Capitol Indemnity v. USACourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2006

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API