C.L.L. v. State

Appellant appeals the trial court’s adjudication of delinquency, contending the court erred in denying his dispositive motion to suppress cannabis and drug paraphernalia found by police in Appellant’s home. Appellant argues the court erred, because the facts did not establish that the “emergency aid exception” justified a war-rantless search of the home. For the reasons explained below, we disagree and affirm.

*1116 Factual Background

Appellant and his friend got into a fight with Curtis Pierce, another resident of Appellant’s home. Someone made a 911 hang-up call, during which a disturbance or…