Floyd v. Ort
Supreme Court of Kansas
Error from Harvey District Court. At the September Term 1876, of the district court, Ort, as plaintiff, recovered judgment against Floyd & Vanosdell, defendants. New trial refused, and defendants bring the case here on error.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Horton, C. J.:
This was an action originally brought before a justice of the peace by the defendant in error against, the plaintiffs in error; and omitting the title, the following is a copy of the bill of particulars:
The plaintiff complains of the said defendants, and says, that heretofore, on the 17th of April 1875, one C. H. Hobart, and one Robert "Vanosdell, one of the above-named defendants, doing business under the firm-name and style of “Hobart & Vanosdell,” were indebted to the said plaintiff upon the following account, to-wit:
Hobart &…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Anthony v. HermanSupreme Court of Kansas · 1875
- Center v. McQuestenSupreme Court of Kansas · 1877
- Kansas Pacific Railway Co. v. HopkinsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1877
- Harrison v. SimpsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1877
3Cited by6 opinions
- Holmes v. KalbachSupreme Court of Kansas · 1953
- Maddock v. RiggsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1920
- Alliance Mutual Life Assurance Society of the United States v. WelchSupreme Court of Kansas · 1881
- Edwards v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1939
- Lawrence Nat. Bank v. RiceCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1936
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.