Surant v. Ostroski
Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Delaware County
1Opinion of the Court
Broomall, J.,
Plaintiff recovered a verdict against defendant for the support of her child, alleging that defendant is the child’s father. Defendant has filed motion for judgment n. o. v. and also motion and reasons for a new trial. Upon the argument before the court en banc, the motion for a new trial was not pressed.
Plaintiff upon the trial offered in evidence a paper dated September 10, 1929, signed by defendant in the following words: “I, Jacob Otroski, of 1403 E. 12th St. Eddystone, Del. Co, Pa. Do hereby agree to give to Mary Durant of Miller and Madduck Ave. Crumlynn Del. Co. Pa. Four…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- King Et Al., Appellants, v. BrillhartSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1921
- Rossmassler v. SpielbergerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1921
- Edgcomb v. CloughSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1922
- Beaver v. SlaneSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1921
- Cameron v. FishmanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.