Legal Opinion

City of Chicago v. Lowenthal

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided February 15, 1909No. Gen. No. 14,506PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Action commenced before justice of the peace. Appeal from the Criminal Court of Cook county; the Hon. George A. Dttput, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Brown

This is an action brought by the city of Chicago for an alleged violation of the junk-shop ordinance, so-called. The appellee is a large dealer, and a dealer in large quantities only—car lots principally—in old and new metals, rubber and rags. He is a wholesale dealer in these commodities, the largest in the city of Chicago. He did not procure a license to keep a “junk shop” or “junk wagon,” because he claimed not to be, in the language of the ordinance in question, ‘ ‘ exercising, carrying on, or engaging in the business of keeping a junk shop, or what is commonly called a junk shop.”

The…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. West Side Metal Refining Co. v. City of ChicagoAppellate Court of Illinois · 1908

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. City of St. Louis v. BaskowitzSupreme Court of Missouri · 1918
  2. City of Chicago v. Iroquois Steel & Iron Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1936
  3. City of Kewanee v. Riverside Industrial Materials Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1959

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API