Legal Opinion
Jerry Hurst v. Colin Shalk
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided August 2, 2016No. 15-2830UnpublishedCited by 37 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION *
2Per curiam
Jerry Hurst, proceeding pro se, appeals an order of the United States District Court for the District of Delaware denying his motion pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915 to proceed in forma pauperis. For the reasons that follow, we will vacate the District Court’s order and remand for further proceedings.
Hurst filed a complaint against State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company and other parties claiming violations of the Driver’s Privacy Protection Act, 18 U.S.C. §§ 2721-2725, and other laws. Hurst filed an application to proceed in forma pauperis, or without prepayment of the District…
3Cases cited5 opinions
- Adkins v. E. I. DuPont De Nemours & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Walker v. People Express Airlines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1989
- Sinwell, William v. Governor Milton Shapp, Governor of PennsylvaniaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1976
- Kenneth Souder v. Michael McGuire Superintendent, Farview State Hospital, Waymart, PennsylvaniaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1975
- Donald Sylvester Jones v. Charles H. Zimmerman, Superintendent, and Leroy S. Zimmerman, Attorney General of PennsylvaniaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1985
4Cited by37 opinions
- Amy B. v. Commissioner of Social SecurityDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2026
- Anthony J. Brewington v. Aramark Management Services, L.P.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2026
- Anthony McGill v. Sherera ShacklefordDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2026
- Brian Heath v. Matthew Platkin, et al.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2026
- Cartier Gray v. GT Auto SalesDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2026
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.