Kurstelska v. Jackson
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Appeal by defendants from an order of the district court for Winona county, Snow, J., denying a motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict and granting a motion for a new trial.
1Opinion of the CourtCollins, J.
The plaintiff’s husband was killed while at work for defendants in the construction of a sewer, and as administratrix she brought this action under the provisions of Gt. S. 1894, § 5913. At the close of the testimony the motion provided for in Laws 1895, c. 320, was made by defendants’ counsel and denied. In addition to the general verdict for the plaintiff, the jury answered three separate questions submitted by the court for special findings; the first in the affirmative, the second and third in the negative. Subse*416quently a motion was made by defendants for judgment in their favor…
2Cited by3 opinions
- Kurstelska v. JacksonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1903
- Boushor v. KuhlmannSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1924
- Kurstelska v. JacksonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1904