Legal Opinion

Christoffels v. Alton Properties, Inc.

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided June 5, 1972PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This is a bill in equity in which the plaintiffs, ten residents of Tewksbury, seek to prevent the filling of a certain pond (Ames Pond) in Tewksbury and the construction of a shopping center. From a final decree dismissing the bill, the plaintiffs appeal. We have before us a report of material facts and a transcript of the evidence. Ames Pond is an area which can be lawfully filled only under the terms of G. L. c. 131, § 140, as amended, the “Hatch Act.” The plaintiffs argue that the statute is unconstitutional because it affords them no opportunity to be heard prior to the issuance by the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Massachusetts Commission Against Discrimination v. ColangeloMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1962
  2. Brady v. Board of Appeals of WestportMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1965
  3. Mullholland v. State Racing CommissionMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1936
  4. Hallenborg v. Town Clerk of BillericaMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1971

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. City of Boston v. Massachusetts Port AuthorityMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1974
  2. Board of Appeals of Maynard v. Housing Appeals Comm.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1976
  3. Springfield Preservation Trust, Inc. v. Springfield Historical CommissionMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1980
  4. Woods v. BrimmMassachusetts Superior Court · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API