Christoffels v. Alton Properties, Inc.
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
1Opinion of the Court
This is a bill in equity in which the plaintiffs, ten residents of Tewksbury, seek to prevent the filling of a certain pond (Ames Pond) in Tewksbury and the construction of a shopping center. From a final decree dismissing the bill, the plaintiffs appeal. We have before us a report of material facts and a transcript of the evidence. Ames Pond is an area which can be lawfully filled only under the terms of G. L. c. 131, § 140, as amended, the “Hatch Act.” The plaintiffs argue that the statute is unconstitutional because it affords them no opportunity to be heard prior to the issuance by the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Massachusetts Commission Against Discrimination v. ColangeloMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1962
- Brady v. Board of Appeals of WestportMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1965
- Mullholland v. State Racing CommissionMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1936
- Hallenborg v. Town Clerk of BillericaMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1971
3Cited by4 opinions
- City of Boston v. Massachusetts Port AuthorityMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1974
- Board of Appeals of Maynard v. Housing Appeals Comm.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1976
- Springfield Preservation Trust, Inc. v. Springfield Historical CommissionMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1980
- Woods v. BrimmMassachusetts Superior Court · 2010