Legal Opinion
Specialized Monitoring Solutions, LLC v. ADT LLC
District Court, E.D. Texas
Decided February 7, 2019No. Civil Action No. 2:17-cv-768-WCBPublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
WILLIAM C. BRYSON, UNITED STATES CIRCUIT JUDGE
Before the Court is a motion for summary judgment by defendant ADT LLC d/b/a ADT Security Services ("ADT"). Dkt. No. 62. Plaintiff Specialized Monitoring Solutions, LLC, ("SMS") is the owner of U.S. Patent No. 6,657,553 ("the '553 patent") and has asserted claims 1-5, 7-9, 17-23, 25-27, and 35-36 of that patent against ADT. ADT seeks summary judgment of invalidity as to all of the claims asserted against it, arguing that the asserted claims of the '553 patent are invalid under 35 U.S.C. § 101 for failure to recite patentable subject matter. The…
2Cases cited49 opinions
- Mayo Collaborative Services v. Prometheus Laboratories, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2012
- Enfish, LLC v. Microsoft CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2016
- Bilski v. KapposSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
- Berkheimer v. Hp Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2018
- Electric Power Group, LLC v. Alstom S.A.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2016
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Bright Data Ltd. v. Teso LT, UABDistrict Court, E.D. Texas · 2021