Legal Opinion

Rossignoll v. Northeastern Railroad

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided October 13, 1885PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Railroads. Damages. Negligence. Cattle. Before Judge Estes. Habersham Superior Court. March Term, 1885. Reported in the decision.

1Opinion of the Court

Hall, Justice.

The plaintiff donated to the railroad company a right-of-way through an enclosed field belonging to him; the fence around this field came to the road-bed on each side of the same, and at each place where the road intersected the enclosure, stock-guards were placed by the company at both-the openings made in the enclosure by its road. The declaration alleged these facts; and further, that these guards were insufficient to keep the stock out of his field, on which was a growing crop of corn and other field . products; that, in consequence of the insufficiency of these stock-gaps…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Davis v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1955
  2. Southern Railway Co. v. HarrellSupreme Court of Georgia · 1898
  3. Davis v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1955

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API