Legal Opinion
Clark v. City of Tucson
Court of Appeals of Arizona
Decided July 8, 1965No. 2 CA-CIV 49, 2 CA-CIV 50PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MOLLOY, Judge.
We have before us two appeals which present the identical legal question. Both involve the question of whether land owned by the plaintiff, City of Tucson, lying within the boundaries of Cochise County is exempt from ad valorem taxes imposed in Cochise County.
The plaintiff, City of Tucson, prevailed in both actions in the trial court. In the one it received a writ of mandamus ordering Sam R. Clark, Cochise County Assessor and F. C. Alexander, Cochise County Treasurer to strike the name of the City of Tucson from the tax assessment rolls of Cochise County and in the other it…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Town of Benson v. County of JohnstonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1936
- Mallard v. . Housing AuthoritySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
- Bohannan v. Corporation CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1957
- Atlantic & N. C. R. R. Co. v. Board of Commissioners of Carteret CountySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1876
- Zangerle v. City of ClevelandOhio Supreme Court · 1945
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Bussanich v. DouglasCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1986
- Pinetop-Lakeside Sanitary District v. FergusonArizona Supreme Court · 1981
- County Court Judges Ass'n v. SidiWyoming Supreme Court · 1988
- City of Eloy v. Pinal CountyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1988
- City of Burlington v. City of South BurlingtonVermont Superior Court · 2016
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.