Union Joint Stock Land Bank of Detroit v. Byerly
Supreme Court of the United States
1Dissent
Mr. Justice Black, Mr. Justice Douglas, and Mr. Justice Murphy,
dissenting.
We believe that to deny this farmer the benefits of the Act because the purchase by the mortgagee at the sheriff’s sale was confirmed during the short interval between the dismissal of his petition and its reinstatement, would be largely to defeat the purposes of the Act.
After the original subsection (s) of the Frazier-Lemke Act was declared unconstitutional by the decision of this Court, May 27,1935,1 this farmer’s petition was dismissed, August 26, 1935. A scant two days after the dismissal, August 28, Congress…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Louisville Joint Stock Land Bank v. RadfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Kalb v. FeuersteinSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Wayne United Gas Co. v. Owens-Illinois Glass Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1937
- Brown v. CampbellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
- MacKenzie v. A. Engelhard & Sons Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1924
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.