Legal Opinion

Dopsovic v. Stork Restaurant, Inc.

New York Supreme Court

Decided September 30, 1960PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtGeorge Tilzer, J.

Defendant Stork Restaurant, Inc., moves for dismissal of the complaint for legal insufficiency. Defendant’s employee is charged with slander per se in that he said of the plaintiff “ This is the man who walked out of here about two months ago without paying his $11.00 bill”; and “You were sitting right at that end of the bar with two women ”; and “ your *869wife was not one of them ”. Plaintiff insists that he has thus been charged with punishable crime which alone in this context would sustain a complaint in slander per se. The words do not charge plaintiff with punishable crime (Moore v.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Moore v. . FrancisNew York Court of Appeals · 1890
  2. Steward v. World-Wide Automobiles Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1959
  3. Stevens v. WhelanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1931
  4. Gillespie v. ByrneAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1912
  5. Reese v. Julia Sport Wear, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1940

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Jordan v. LewisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1964

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API