Legal Opinion · Concurrence

St. Lawrence v. Bartley

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided January 26, 1998No. S97A2039Published

1ConcurrenceCarley, Justice

I concur in the majority’s affirmance of the grant of Ms. Bartley’s petition for habeas corpus relief, but I am compelled to write separately so as to explain my reasons for doing so.

As the majority notes, there is a fundamental distinction between an extradition premised upon OCGA § 17-13-23 and an extradition proceeding brought pursuant to OCGA § 17-13-25. By its terms, OCGA § 17-13-23 requires a showing “that the accused was present in the demanding state at the time of the commission of the alleged crime and that thereafter he fled from the state. . . .’’No such showing is required when…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Michigan v. DoranSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. Hutson v. StonerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1979
  3. State Ex Rel. Wagner v. HedmanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1972
  4. Dawson v. SmithSupreme Court of Georgia · 1920
  5. Jenkins v. GarrisonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1995

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API