Legal Opinion

The Merino

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided March 18, 1824PublishedCited by 42 opinions

1Opinion of the Court 1

22 U.S. 391 (1824)

9 Wheat. 391

The MERINO.

The CONSTITUTION.

The LOUISA.

BARRIAS, and others, Claimants.

Supreme Court of United States.

February 20, 1824.

March 5, 1824.

Mr. C.J. Ingersoll, for the appellants.

The Attorney-General and Mr. Kelly, contra.

2Opinion of the Court · WashingtonJustice Washington

And, after stating the case, proceeded to enumerate the objections made by the counsel for the appellants, to the several decrees of the Court below.

1. That the regular Admiralty process was not issued in these cases.

2. That the informations do not conclude against the form of the statute.

3. That the District Court of Alabama had not jurisdiction, the…

3Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Schooner Hoppet & Cargo v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1813
  2. The Ship Richmond v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1815
  3. The SamuelSupreme Court of the United States · 1816

4Cited by42 opinions

  1. Cook v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
  2. The Confiscation CasesSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
  3. In Re JohnsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
  4. Dodge v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
  5. United States v. $39,000 in Canadian CurrencyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1986

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API