Legal Opinion
Lee v. Patton
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided May 23, 1978No. 77-1054PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Per curiam
In the first appearance of this cause before this court (Lee v. Patton, 342 So.2d 542) we were concerned with the ruling of the trial judge setting forth the burden of a donee of an inter vivos gift to rebut a presumption of undue influence which arose from such gift. Based on In re Estate of Carpenter, 253 So.2d 697 (Fla.1971) and Majorana v. Constantine, 318 So.2d 185 (Fla.2d DCA 1975) we held:
“ . . . that the donee’s burden of rebutting a properly raised presumption of undue influence relating to an inter vivos gift is only such as to come forward with a reasonable explanation of the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- In Re Estate of CarpenterSupreme Court of Florida · 1971
- Majorana v. ConstantineDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1975
- Lee v. PattonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1977
3Cited by2 opinions
- Meth v. SparagaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1981
- Tilzer v. TilzerDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1982