Legal Opinion

Holloway v. Gower

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided January 7, 2009No. 060707838; A135669PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSchuman, J.

Petitioner sought post-conviction relief, alleging that his trial and appellate attorneys provided constitutionally ineffective assistance in their handling of various issues relating to his sentence. The post-conviction trial court denied his claims, and he appeals. We affirm.

The relevant facts are undisputed. Petitioner pleaded guilty to the Class C felony of escape in the second degree. ORS 162.155. He was sentenced in November 2003. Based on its own factual findings, the trial court imposed an upward departure sentence of 60 months in prison and 24 months of post-prison supervision (PPS).…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  3. Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  4. Ball v. GladdenOregon Supreme Court · 1968
  5. State v. BrownOregon Supreme Court · 1990

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Mesta v. FrankeCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2014
  2. State v. DelgadoCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2010
  3. Field v. CourseyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2014
  4. State v. ChesnutCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2017
  5. State v. DelgadoCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API