Legal Opinion

Yancy v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided June 24, 1927No. 10876Published

The opinion states the case.

1Opinion

ON MOTION FOR REHEARING.

HAWKINS, Judge.

Appellant renews complaint because the court refused his special charges on the right to arm and seek his adversary for an explanation, such requested charges being the ones discussed in the first and last paragraphs of our original opinion. In addition to the reasons heretofore given why no error was committed in refusing such instructions, there is still another to which we did not advert in our former opinion. The court gave an instruction on self-defense generally and upon self-defense based upon threats, in no way qualified by a charge on provoking…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Boaz v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1920
  2. Smith v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1917
  3. Ott v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1920
  4. Hollman v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1919
  5. Pollard v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1920

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API