Legal Opinion

Clark v. . Henrietta Mills

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided January 8, 1941PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBaeNBXll, J.

When defendant issued to plaintiff her certificates of stock it, by the stipulations printed thereon, contracted to pay her “a fixed, annual, guaranteed, cumulative dividend,” of 7%, payable quarterly “before any dividend shall be set apart or paid on any stock preferred or common, heretofore or hereafter issued by this corporation.”

Under this contract plaintiff became vested with a property right in and to such dividends as they accrued, which property right cannot be divested without her consent, either by a subsequent reorganization or by legislative enactment. Patterson v. Hosiery Mills,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Teachey v. . GurleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1938
  2. Patterson v. Durham Hosiery MillsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1939
  3. McAden v. PalmerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1905
  4. Marshall v. . HammockSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1928
  5. Taylor v. . McMurraySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1860

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Freeman v. PreddySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
  2. East Side Builders, Inc. v. BrownSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
  3. Johnson v. . JohnsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1948
  4. Westbrook ex rel. Westbrook v. RobinsonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1971
  5. Janes v. Washburn Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1950

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API