Legal Opinion

Ruffin v. Beal

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided May 10, 1978No. Civ. A. No. 77-185Published

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OF DECISION

McGLYNN, District Judge.

This matter is before the Court on cross-motions for summary judgment. For the reasons hereinafter stated the plaintiffs’ motion will be denied and the defendants’ motion will be granted.

The basic facts are undisputed and are as follows:

Naomi Ruffin and Doris Bellamy are residents of Philadelphia County of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania. Both are eligible for and receive benefits for themselves and their children under the Aid to Families with Dependent Children (AFDC) Program. Title IV-A of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. § 601 et seq. In…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Perry v. SindermannSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. Paul v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  5. Meachum v. FanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1976

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API