Horwitz v. Murri

rms case came to the Court of Appeals from the Cuyahoga Common Pleas and the principal question to be determined is whether the court committed prejudicial error in suspending judgment on a petition to vacate, after term, without a strict and substantial compliance with the statutes and authorities governing the suspension and .vacation of judgments of the Court of Common Pleas after term, on any of the grounds enumerated in 11631 GC., et seq.

The Court of Appeals held:

1. The court suspended the judgment theretofore rendered on a statutory application to vacate, without first deciding the…