Northcutt v. Missouri Pacific Railway Co.

In the district court for Otoe county plaintiff, a consignee, recovered a judgment against defendant, a common carrier, for the loss of property in transit. Included in plaintiff’s recovery was an attorney’s fee allowed pursuant to statute. Rev. St. 1913, sec. 6063. Defendant appealed to this court, where the judgment of the district court was affirmed April 15, 1916, without an opinion. By motion plaintiff now asks for the allowance of an additional fee *2for the services of his attorney in this court. The motion is resisted on the ground that the supreme court has no authority to make such an…