Legal Opinion
Koslosky v. Khorramian
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided July 25, 2006PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (LeVine, J.), dated June 20, 2005, which, in effect, granted that branch of the defendants’ motion which was for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.
Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.
The conditional preclusion language in the parties’ so-ordered stipulation became absolute upon the plaintiffs’ failure to comply with its terms (see Echevarria v Pathmark Stores, Inc., 7 AD3d 750, 751 [2004]; Hall v Penas, 5 AD3d 549 [2004]; Marrone v Orson Holding…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Echevarria v. Pathmark Stores, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
- Hall v. PenasAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
- Stewart v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
- Barriga v. SapoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
- Marrone v. Orson Holding Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
3Cited by4 opinions
- Wei Hong Hu v. SadiqiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- Calder v. CoftaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
- Mahgoub v. 880 Realty, LLCAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017
- Alhomedi v. TDS Leasing, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007