Legal Opinion

Water Works Supply Corp. v. Cahill

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided May 31, 1962PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWhittemore, J.

These are the appeals of the respondent United States Casualty Company (the bonding company) from final decrees on a petition to enforce rights under G. L. c. 149, § 29. At issue are (1) the statutory rights of the subcontractors under G. L. c. 149, § 29, as appearing in St. 1957, c. 682, § 1, as well as the right of the bonding company in a retained percentage under the prime contract, and (2) the rights of subcontractors who filed their claims within the statutory period but did not intervene within a year after filing their claims.

By the prime contract of December 17,1957, Quincy…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Old Colony Crushed Stone Co. v. CroninMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1931
  2. Darling-Singer Lumber Co. v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1935
  3. JJ Struzziery Co. Inc. v. AV Taurasi Co. Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1960
  4. Marinucci Bros. & Co. Inc. v. Semper Constr. Co. Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1962

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. City of Colby v. HurttSupreme Court of Kansas · 1973
  2. State Ex Rel. Wilkerson v. MurraySupreme Court of Missouri · 1971
  3. Long Island Painting Corp. v. Beacon Construction Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1963
  4. Drinkwater v. D. Guschov Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1964
  5. Philip Richenburg Insurance Agency, Inc. v. Ruscito Contracting Co.Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1966

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API