Legal Opinion

State v. Breest

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided September 30, 1975No. 6906PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGrimes, J.

The issues raised by the defendant are whether he was prejudiced by having a state’s witness claim the privilege against self-incrimination before the jury and then testify under a grant of immunity and whether the prosecutor’s argument to the jury denied him a fair trial.

Defendant was tried before a jury after being indicted for burglary. He was found guilty and his exceptions were transferred by Keller, C.J.

During the course of the trial, a witness for the State claimed the privilege against self-incrimination before the jury. During a recess and in the absence of the jury, the witness was…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Douglas v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  2. State v. BlakeSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1973
  3. State v. O'BRIENSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1974

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. BreestSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1976
  2. State v. BelknerSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1977
  3. State v. MeloonSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1979
  4. State v. MeloonSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1976
  5. State v. PlaceSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API