Legal Opinion
United States v. Rodgers
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Decided May 4, 2011No. 11-6285PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Per curiam
Carson Darrell Rodgers appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for reduction of sentence under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See United States v. Rodgers, No. 1:02-cr-00374-WO-2 (M.D.N.C. Feb. 14, 2011). We deny Rodgers’s motion for appointment of counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
2Cited by11 opinions
- Perry Capital LLC v. LewDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2014
- Kellmer ex rel. Fannie Mae v. RainesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2012
- Leon County Florida v. Federal Housing Finance AgencyCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2012
- Federal Housing Finance Agency v. Nomura Holding America, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2015
- Skylights LLC v. ByronDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 2015
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.