Legal Opinion

City of Chicago v. Yellen

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided September 4, 2001No. 1-00-1309 RelPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice McNULTY

In an action for demolition, an owner of the building failed to appear for trial, and the court entered the judgment sought. The owner argues that the record does not show proper service of summons on her. We hold that because the record includes no evidence that the clerk of court ever signed or sealed a summons to the owner, the trial court lacked jurisdiction to enter judgment against the owner who failed to appear.

On September 10, 1999, the City of Chicago (the City) filed a complaint for demolition of a building in Chicago. The complaint listed the property’s owners, Nathan and Marie…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. State Bank of Lake Zurich v. ThillIllinois Supreme Court · 1986
  2. Amy v. WatertownSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
  3. In Re Estate of AlbergoAppellate Court of Illinois · 1995
  4. Sullivan v. BachAppellate Court of Illinois · 1981
  5. J. C. Penney Co. v. WestAppellate Court of Illinois · 1983

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Morr-Fitz, Inc. v. BlagojevichIllinois Supreme Court · 2008
  2. National City Bank v. MajerczykAppellate Court of Illinois · 2011
  3. Morr-Fitz, Inc. v. BlagojevichIllinois Supreme Court · 2008
  4. Morr-Fitz, Inc. v. BlagojevichIllinois Supreme Court · 2008
  5. National City Bank v. MAJERCZYKAppellate Court of Illinois · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API