Legal Opinion

Clark v. Hanson

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided February 18, 1926No. 17206. Reversed and remandedPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Farmer

Burton Hanson died testate in Cook county, leaving a widow but no child or descendants of a child surviving him. By his will he made some provision for his widow and devised the residue of his estate to others whose relationship to the testator is not stated. The will was duly admitted to probate and letters testamentary were issued to O. W. Dynes as executor, October 31, 1922. The administration of the estate is still pending. Within a year after letters testamentary were issued the widow filed a written renunciation of the provision made for her by the will and an election to take in lieu…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Boyles v. McMurphyIllinois Supreme Court · 1870
  2. Scheible v. RinckIllinois Supreme Court · 1902
  3. White v. DanceIllinois Supreme Court · 1870
  4. Giger v. BishopIllinois Supreme Court · 1907

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Groome v. Freyn Engineering Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1940
  2. Stoxen v. StoxenAppellate Court of Illinois · 1972
  3. Hanson v. ClarkAppellate Court of Illinois · 1927
  4. Farrow v. JuddAppellate Court of Illinois · 1937
  5. Simons v. CorlettAppellate Court of Illinois · 1928

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API