Leal v. Aluminum Company of America
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
NYE, Justice.
This is a personal injury damage suit. The jury found the defendant negligent and the plaintiff contributorily negligent. The principal question upon appeal is one of jury misconduct. Proof of the alleged misconduct arose in an unusual manner. The trial court denied the motion for new trial and the plaintiff has perfected his appeal to this Court.
During the time the jury was deliberating, the trial judge was called to the ad*944joining county to receive the report of a grand jury of that county. In his absence and while the jury was deliberating, the attorneys sat in the jury…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Wagner v. FosterTexas Supreme Court · 1960
- Compton v. HenrieTexas Supreme Court · 1963
- Fountain v. FergusonTexas Supreme Court · 1969
- Allan v. Materials Transportation Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1963
- Transamerica Insurance Company v. BesedaCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1969
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Inman v. PadrezasCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1976
- Rio Delta Land Co. v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1978
- Bradbury v. State Ex Rel. ClutterCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1973
- Lakeland Properties, Inc. v. MangumCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1974
- Leal v. Aluminum Company of AmericaCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1969