Peabody v. United States

Mollison, Judge:

These are appeals for reappraisement of values found by the appraiser under the Antidumping Act of 1921 (19 U. S. C. § 161 et seg.) on importations of matches from Finland. In his opening statement at the trial, counsel for the plaintiff indicated that the plaintiff had little, if any, evidence to offer on the merits of the issue, i. e., the values, but that the main contention to be made was that each of the appraisements was invalid.

Counsel for the plaintiff and for the defendant stipulated facts which would indicate that there was neither a sufficient designation of…