Raftelis v. Bank of Georgetown
Supreme Court of South Carolina
Before Shipp, J., Georgetown, May, 1916. Action by James Raftelis against the Bank of Georgetown. From an order denying defendant’s motion to require plaintiff to state his two causes of action separately, defendant appeals. ■ - . • ' submits: Separate statements: C. C. Rule 18; Code Civ.
Read the full summary
Before Shipp, J., Georgetown, May, 1916. Action by James Raftelis against the Bank of Georgetown. From an order denying defendant’s motion to require plaintiff to state his two causes of action separately, defendant appeals. ■ - . • ' submits: Separate statements: C. C. Rule 18; Code Civ. Proc., sec. 218. Order appealable: 26 S. C. 415; 8 S. C. 112; 11 S. C. 122. Distinguishes: 42. S. C. 547; 60 S. C. 521; 36 S. C. 36; 74 S. C. 13; 77 S. C. 367; 34 S. C. 346. Appealable orders: 78 S. C. 329; 65 S. C. 226; 66 S. C. 16; 11 S. C. 411; 13 S. C. 23; 14 S. C. 436; 26 S. C. 415; 32 S. C. 142; 36 S.…
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the Court was delivered by
Mr. Justice Fraser.
The plaintiff alleged that he was a depositor in the'defendant bank and drew two checks on his account ; that the defendant refused to pay either check, although the plaintiff had funds on deposit with the defendant, in excess of the sums for which the checks were drawn; that, when the plaintiff demanded to know why his checks were not honored, the defendant’s cashier stated that a third person claimed to be entitled to the funds in the bank deposited by the plaintiff, and for that reason the checks had been refused payment. The…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Wichman v. ScarpaSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1915
3Cited by1 opinion
- Floyd v. American Employers' Ins. Co. of BostonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1938