Legal Opinion
Skrzypczak v. Kauger
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided August 12, 1996No. 95-6156PublishedCited by 31 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
TACHA, Circuit Judge.
In 1993, the Oklahoma Supreme Court held that a proposed initiative restricting abortion, State Question 642 (“SQ 642”), could not be placed on the ballot because it was unconstitutional. In re Initiative Petition No. 34.9, 838 P.2d 1, 7-8 (Okla.1992), cert. denied, 506 U.S. 1071, 113 S.Ct. 1028, 122 L.Ed.2d 173 (1993). Monica Skrzypczak, who was not a party to that action, filed this suit against the justices of the Oklahoma Supreme Court alleging that the court’s refusal to place SQ 642 on the ballot constituted a prior restraint on speech. The district court granted…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- District of Columbia Court of Appeals v. FeldmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Lujan v. National Wildlife FederationSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Valley Forge Christian College v. Americans United for Separation of Church and State, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- Initiative & Referendum Institute v. WalkerCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2006
- Proctor & Gamble Co. v. HaugenCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2000
- Save Palisade Fruitlands v. ToddCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2002
- Amazon, Inc. v. Cannondale Corp.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2001
- Victor Johnson v. Monica Rodrigues (Orozco) Sealed Defendant-98-550-1 Sealed Defendant-98-550-2 Adoption Center of ChoiceCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2000
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.