Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Zanakis-Pico v. Cutter Dodge, Inc.

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided July 26, 2002No. 22987Published

1Concurrence

Concurring Opinion of

ACOBA, J.

I concur in the majority’s resolution of the claims of Plaintiffs-Appellants/Cross-Appel-lees Mary Zanakis-Pico and Thomas M. Pico (the Picos).1 As to the Picos’ tort claims, I write separately (1) to clarify that minimal sums of compensatory damages are not synonymous with “nominal damages,” as seemingly suggested by the Picos, and (2) to dispel the view of the circuit court of the first circuit (the court) that “substantial pecuniary damage” encompasses a threshold amount. I believe it is essential in our case law to maintain clarity in the definitions,…

2Cases cited65 opinions

  1. Lama Holding Co. v. Smith Barney Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1996
  2. Basista v. WeirCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1965
  3. Mace v. Van Ru Credit Corp.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1997
  4. Nappe v. Anschelewitz, Barr, Ansell & BonelloSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1984
  5. United Parcel Service Co. v. RickertKentucky Supreme Court · 1999

60 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API