Legal Opinion
Amerada Hess Corp. v. LOCAL 22026 FED. LAB. U., AFL-CIO
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided October 31, 1974No. Civ. A. 74-842PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION and ORDER
CLARKSON S. FISHER, District Judge.
This is a motion by plaintiffs to vacate an arbitration award and a cross-motion by defendant for summary judgment and affirmation of the arbitration award. Plaintiff places reliance on 9 U.S.C. Sec. 10(a-d) as a basis for its motion to vacate. 1
Specifically, plaintiffs urge that the arbitration award be vacated pursuant to 9 U.S.C. Sec. 10(b) which permits a United States District- Court to vacate an arbitration award “ . . . where there was evident partiality or corrup tion in the arbitrators, or either of them”, and 9 U.S.C. Section 10(d)…
2Cases cited39 opinions
- United Steelworkers v. Warrior & Gulf Navigation Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
- United Steelworkers v. Enterprise Wheel & Car Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
- United Steelworkers v. American Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
- Wilko v. SwanSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
- Bernhardt v. Polygraphic Co. of America, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1956
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Shearson Hayden Stone, Inc. v. LiangDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1980
- Teamsters Local Union No. 394 v. Associated Grocers of Iowa Cooperative, Inc.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1978
- International Ladies' Garment Workers' Union v. DeeVille Blouse Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1980
- Kamakazi Music Corp. v. Robbins Music Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1981
- Makress Lingerie, Inc. v. International Ladies' Garment Workers' UnionDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1975
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.