Legal Opinion

Indursky v. BD. OF TRUSTEES, RET. SYSTEM

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided November 24, 1975PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

137 N.J. Super. 335 (1975)

349 A.2d 86

HARRY INDURSKY, APPELLANT,

v.

BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE PUBLIC EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT SYSTEM, DIVISION OF PENSIONS OF THE DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY, STATE OF NEW JERSEY, RESPONDENT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Argued September 29, 1975.

Decided November 24, 1975.

Before Judges CARTON, CRAHAY and HANDLER.

Mr. Sanford Schneider argued the cause for appellant (Messrs. De Rose, Spinrad & Schneider, attorneys).

Mr. Samuel J. Halpern, Deputy Attorney General, argued the cause for respondent (Mr. William F. Hyland, Attorney General of New Jersey,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Skulski v. NolanSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1975
  2. In Re ArndtSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1975
  3. Ruvoldt v. NolanSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1973

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Miller v. TEACHERS'PENSION & ANNUITY FUNDNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1981
  2. Hemsey v. Board of TrusteesNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2007
  3. STATE EX REL. PERA v. LongacreNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2001
  4. Bierne v. Employees' Retirement SystemNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1980
  5. ELLEN SCHWARTZ VS. DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY, DIVISION OF PENSIONS AND BENEFITS (TEACHERS' PENSION AND ANNUITY FUND)New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2020

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API