Legal Opinion
Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co. v. Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided May 25, 1989No. Civ. A. 85-3162 SSHPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
STANLEY S. HARRIS, District Judge.
This matter, as well as what is perhaps best characterized as a companion case, Western Maryland Railway Company v. Harbor Insurance Company, Civil Action No. 85-3163, are before the Court on a variety of motions. Because decisions reached in this action necessarily affect the companion case, a separate Memorandum Order also is being issued today in Western Maryland.
Background
The three plaintiffs in this action are Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Company (C & 0), Baltimore & Ohio Railway Company (B & 0), and Seaboard System Railroad Incorporated…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Urie v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- American Fire & Casualty Co. v. FinnSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Provident Tradesmens Bank & Trust Co. v. PattersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Smith v. SperlingSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Anand Prakash v. American UniversityCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1984
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Western Maryland Railway Company v. Harbor Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1990
- Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co. v. Certain Underwriters at Lloyd'sDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1993
- Forty-Eight Insulations, Inc. v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. (In Re Forty-Eight Insulations, Inc.)District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1989