In re Beard
Supreme Court of Louisiana
1Opinion of the Court
DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDINGS
liPER CURIAM.
On October 30, 1996, respondent was reinstated to the practice of law after a three year suspension resulting from a federal perjury conviction in which respondent made a false declaration in his personal bankruptcy proceeding in violation of 18 U.S.C. 152. Respondent’s reinstatement, however, was conditional upon his fulfillment of the following conditions:
1. That a practice monitor should be provided for Beard from a list of volunteers maintained by Disciplinary Counsel in accordance with the procedural rules for probation monitors, Rule XIX, Appendix C.…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cited by2 opinions
- In re BeardSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2000
- Wessinger v. CainDistrict Court, M.D. Louisiana · 2022