Legal Opinion

In re Beard

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided December 13, 1996No. 94-B-2824PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDINGS

liPER CURIAM.

On October 30, 1996, respondent was reinstated to the practice of law after a three year suspension resulting from a federal perjury conviction in which respondent made a false declaration in his personal bankruptcy proceeding in violation of 18 U.S.C. 152. Respondent’s reinstatement, however, was conditional upon his fulfillment of the following conditions:

1. That a practice monitor should be provided for Beard from a list of volunteers maintained by Disciplinary Counsel in accordance with the procedural rules for probation monitors, Rule XIX, Appendix C.…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. In re BeardSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2000
  2. Wessinger v. CainDistrict Court, M.D. Louisiana · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API