Legal Opinion
Doe v. Ward
District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Decided September 18, 2000No. Civ.A. 98-1746PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
CINDRICH, District Judge.
This action arises from the application of the Pennsylvania' Registration of Sexual Offenders Act, popularly known as “Megan’s Law,” 42 Pa.Cons.Stat. Sections 9791-9799.6 (also referred to herein as the “Original Act”), amended by S.B. No. 380, 184th Reg.Sess., Act No. 2000-18, 2000 Pa.Legis. Service. No. 2 at pp. 53-68 (referred to generally herein as the “Amended Act”) 1 , to plaintiff John Doe (“Doe”). 2 Doe filed the instant complaint seeking preliminary and permanent injunc-tive relief in connection with the defendants’ application of the…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Pennhurst State School and Hospital v. HaldermanSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Reed v. FarleySupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Cuyler v. AdamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Carchman v. NashSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Commonwealth v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Doe v. Pennsylvania Bd. of Probation and ParoleCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2008
- Gillette Commercial Operations North America & Subsidiaries v. Department of TreasuryMichigan Court of Appeals · 2015
- Goings v. Court Services & Offender Supervision AgencyDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011
- Lines v. WargoDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2003
- Doe v. McVeyDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2005
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.