Legal Opinion
In re the Claim of Lawson
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided June 15, 1989PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMahoney, P. J.
Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed October 27, 1988, which ruled that claimant was entitled to receive unemployment insurance benefits.
Claimant worked as a screw machine operator for Eastman Kodak Company and was frequently absent. After the number of absences had reached excessive proportions, claimant received an awareness warning dated March 3, 1987 and, thereafter, a final warning for excessive absenteeism and improper absence notification dated September 24, 1987. On May 6, 1988, claimant was scheduled to report for work at approximately 3:30 p.m.,…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- In re Charles A. Field Delivery Service, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1985
- Heil v. F & M Schaefer Brewing Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1976
- In re the Claim of RamseyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1978
- In re the Claim of MichelfelderAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1981
- In re the Claim of PattersonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1975
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- In re the Claim of BarnesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
- In re the Claim of BrionesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
- In re the Claim of FinnAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004