Legal Opinion

Etten v. Newton

New York Court of Common Pleas

Decided February 3, 1890PublishedCited by 9 opinions

On reargument. Eor former opinions and statements, see 6 N. Y. Supp. 531, and 7 N. Y. Supp. 663.

1Opinion of the CourtBischoff, J.

This action was brought in the first district court to recover damages in the nature of demurrage for the detention of plaintiff’s boat, and it was tried by the justice without a jury. On July 10, 1888, judgment was rendered for plaintiff in the sum of $60, which was reversed on appeal as excessive. The second trial, on February 21, 1889, resulted in a judgment for plaintiff for $51, and upon appeal to the general term of this court the last judgment was affirmed; the chief justice writing an opinion in affirmance, which is reported in full in 6 N. Y. Supp. 531. Thereafter defendants were…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Tompkins v. . DudleyNew York Court of Appeals · 1862
  2. Long v. New York Central RailroadNew York Court of Appeals · 1872
  3. Van Etten v. NewtonNew York Court of Common Pleas · 1889

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Amarillo Oil Co. v. Ranch Creek Oil & Gas Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1925
  2. Lehigh Portland Cement Co. v. Virginia Steamship Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1922
  3. Hokanson v. Western Empire Land Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1916
  4. Foster v. Holbrook-Armstrong Iron Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1914
  5. City of New York v. Local 333New York Supreme Court · 1980

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API