Legal Opinion
Bono v. City of New York
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
Decided December 22, 2003PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
*60OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
Order unanimously affirmed without costs.
It was uncontroverted at the framed issue hearing in this matter, held to determine whether plaintiff Anthony Bono was a special employee of defendant, that “all essential, locational and commonly recognizable components of the work relationship” were between Bono and the City of New York (see Thompson v Grumman Aerospace Corp., 78 NY2d 553, 558 [1991]). Representatives of the City’s Department of Housing Preservation and Development (HPD) testified that HPD had complete control over hiring, firing and discipline of…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Thompson v. Grumman Aerospace Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1991
- Braxton v. . MendelsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1922
- State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. LiMauroAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
- Brunetti v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
- Sanfilippo v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Moya v. City of New YorkNew York Supreme Court · 2005