Legal Opinion
Koeppel v. City of New York
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided January 18, 1994PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
—Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Martin Schoenfeld, J.), entered January 12, 1993, which denied the motion of defendants-appellants, Hertzberg and Cantor, for summary judgment pursuant to CPLR 3212, dismissing the complaint, unanimously reversed on the law, insofar as appealed from, without costs, defendants-appellants Cantor and Hertzberg’s motion is granted, the complaint is dismissed as against them and the clerk is directed to enter a judgment accordingly.
The defendant partnership, Hertzberg & Cantor, an engineering firm, was retained in 1968 by Tishman Realty the owner/developer,…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Ultramares Corp. v. ToucheNew York Court of Appeals · 1931
- Pulka v. EdelmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
- Tobin v. GrossmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1969
- Eaves Brooks Costume Co. v. Y.B.H. Realty Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1990
- De Angelis v. Lutheran Medical CenterNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Church v. Callanan Industries, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
- Kenny v. Turner Construction Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017
- Lubov v. BermanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999