Legal Opinion

Eaton Corp. v. Labor & Industry Review Commission

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin

Decided January 21, 1985No. 84-886PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMoser, J.

The Labor and Industry Review Commission (LIRC) appeals from the trial court’s reversal of an LIRC order which determined that Robert J. Pabelick (Pabelick) should be awarded $12,000 for potential wage loss because of permanent disfigurement. Because there was credible and substantial evidence to support the LIRC’s findings of fact and its legal conclusion was reasonable, we reverse the trial court.

On cross-appeal, Eaton Corp. (Eaton) argues that scheduled workers’ compensation benefits are the exclusive benefits available to Pabelick for potential wage loss. The trial court held that…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Vande Zande v. Department of Industry, Labor & Human RelationsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1975
  2. Mednicoff v. Department of Industry, Labor & Human RelationsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1972
  3. Schneider Fuel & Supply Co. v. West Allis State BankWisconsin Supreme Court · 1975
  4. Evans Bros. Co. v. Labor & Industry Review CommissionCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1983
  5. Kenwood Merchandising Corp. v. Labor & Industry Review CommissionCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1983

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Brown v. Labor & Industry Review CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 2003
  2. Chappy v. Labor & Industry Review CommissionCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1985
  3. Cargill Feed Division/Cargill Malt v. Labor & Industry Review CommissionCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2010
  4. County of Dane v. Labor & Industry Review CommissionCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2007
  5. Patrick Cudahy Inc. v. Labor & Industry Review CommissionCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API